| Another
week of reading the “weird” news, and there’s
another story about some kind of bastardized new animal made
up from mismatched animal parents. This week it was the birth
of a part-whale-part-dolphin aka “wolphin.” Although
it seems that the new “wolphin” is actually the
kid of another 19-year-old wolphin that’s living in
Hawaii. I guess where it’s living doesn’t matter
a whole lot, but then again, I caught the story in a newspaper
published in Iowa. Must’ve been a slow news day in Iowa.
But at any rate, there’s been one of these wolphin things
living in a sea park in Hawaii for the last however many years,
and now it’s got a kid that’s only weeks old and
is already bigger than a year-old normal dolphin.
But like I said, this is just the most recent in a string
of the crossbred animal stories I’ve seen. I think the
whole damn thing started back when “Napoleon Dynamite”
came out however long ago, and there was that one bit about
Napoleon drawing pictures of a “liger,” which
is supposedly a cross between a lion and a tiger that’s
not really real. But as it turns out, there actually IS an
honest-to-goodness liger out there -- living in California
-- and it’s supposed to be bigger than damn near anything
except an elephant.
So I think the question needs to be raised, who the fuck is
dumb enough to be breeding these super animals? A little bit
of reading tells me that these hybrid-type animals are being
bred in captivity, although it’s possible that the combinations
could occur on their own in nature. I’ve not read a
whole lot of science fiction in my day, but I’ve seen
enough movies about “the folly of man” when it
comes to playing God with science to know that nothing good
ever, EVER comes of dumb shit like this. For shit’s
sake, look at the friggin’ “Jurassic Park”
movies, and that’s just a big ol’ T-Rex tearing
things up, not some T-rex combined with a monkey. Monkeysaurus
Rex. That dude will fuck you up.
So we’ve got a wolphin, a liger, and God only knows
how many other kinds of shit running around out there. I made
Google my bitch long enough to learn that there’s everything
from beefalo (cattle hooked up to buffalo to make healthier
meats… and I may have actually eaten this at some point)
to a zebra crossed with a donkey -- a zebrass. And this is
the scary thing to me: it’s clear that these guys aren’t
strictly doing this to “better the world.” Guys
that go out and make things like a zebrass obviously do it
just because they’re bored off their nerdy asses and
are trying to make things with funny names. Beefalo? Probably
useful. Zebrass? No way. The only thing I think a zebrass
would be good for is being the mascot for some Spanish soccer
team, or to star in a disgusting-yet-heartwarming kid’s
film.
My point is, why are our scientists out there playing around
like this? I can only go with the argument that they’re
trying to make more useful animals just so far. What the hell
do we actually need a liger for, anyhow? To rough up the all
the lions and tigers? My ass. Last time I checked, we had
the whole lion and tiger situation under control. It’s
why we have those “gun” things, to keep beasties
in line. In fact, we’re so good at keeping those badass
cats in line, we’ve almost wiped them out. Maybe we
should work on breeding more of the normal kind of animals
instead of making big super-sized animals that are likely
only to end up fucking our shit up. Captive and docile now,
sure, but you get one duck-billed platybear with a dream to
lead an army of ligers with opposable thumbs, and it’s
game over.
For the sake of all of us, science wonks, please stick to
some more conventional things to play with. “Hey, you
got chocolate in my peanut butter!” is something I can
handle hearing, but I swear to you I can go my whole life
without needing to hear something like “Hey, you got
gorilla in my kangaroo!” Kangorilla? What in the hell
would we do with one of THOSE? |
| Your
browser will occasionally need the Flash plug-in to properly
display some contents of this site.
Articles
will probably contain profanity, because we're all pretty
rude. Please use discretion if you're easily offended.
All
materials published in "the footnote" are the property
of their respective authors (unless otherwise noted) and are
published with their consent. All other material is Copyright
2005 by "the footnote." |