about archives credits links

 
     
Front Page About Archives Forums Links
     
 
Against the Day by Thomas Pynchon
Welcome. Salutations. Greetings. I present to you the start of things. The first in a series. This is the Beyond Book Club. I am your co-host, Hemingway.

And I am your other co-host, Ayn Rand. We'll be discussing books of all types, determining their merit, their place in the realm of human achievement and more.

We will find their darkest heart. We will reveal it to you.
Our first book is Against The Day by Thomas Pynchon. It lacks, I must say, a certainty in its discoverable moral bases for each character.

Damn it, harpy, that isn't the point.

Excuse me? You can't speak to me like that.

See this gun? The gun says I can. It talks softly to me. It talks clearly.

You're insane, old man. Regardless, Against The Day is nothing more than a series of incidents that the characters walk through, manipulated by Pynchon to achieve some goal or another that has no bearing on everything else for far too long.

Which is his point. He is playing with the older tropes. The classic pulp stories. The old western ideas get merged in.

Westerns?

Indeed! The characters, some of them, have books written about their adventures. They know of them. Other characters know of them. Thus do the characters become both fictional and meta-fictional.

And this is a western how, then?

Simplicity itself. Many western heroes, Buffalo Bill, were both larger than life, fictional, as well as real, meta-fictional. Separation of their duality enhanced lives was often difficult.

Ahhh, well yes, when looked at like that. I did, I will say, enjoy the use of communism as the fear of the day. It was both timely and wonderfully tongue in cheek. Though the evils of a non-capitalist state are real Pynchon played with it as an allegory to other fears we hold as a society. He must have meant, however, that as truth as well. For only in a free market can men flex their will upon the world and truly become themselves, realized.

Whatever. Dirty commies. We agree there. Although they were anarchists not communists.

Clearly he meant communists and only used anarchists to make the system of freedom look sillier.

Whatever, bitch. Still, the book was long.

What's wrong with a lengthy look at life?

It wastes my time, woman! I can appreciate the structure but must ask: Was it needed? Were there not better, most succinct ways to craft this tale of man against man and man against nature? Man. Nature. Old enemies. Old allies.

I suppose. Still, it took the time to discover itself. It meandered at times, to be sure, but in acceptable ways.
Also, it has a talking dog.

Which is too fantastical to be dealt with.

Why? It's a dog. It talks. Where is your problem, woman?

It is impossible!

I submit that you speak. I submit it as proof against your impossibilities.

Did you just call me...

A dog. A hound. Shut up and bark, bitch.

You old drunkard!

Fetch my slippers, harpy.

That's it! This is the end!

Yes, let us conclude that this is the end of the review. The ending. No more shall be spoken. Until next time.

You old drunk bastard. There won't be a next time! I quit!

My shotgun and your contract say otherwise. I have three. Three barrels of truth now against you. Make your play.

I hate you.

As you should. This has been the Beyond Book Club. I'm Hemingway, as if you did not know.

I'm Ayn Rand. And I hate this.

Shut it, harpy!

 


Your browser will occasionally need the Flash plug-in to properly display some contents of this site.

Articles will probably contain profanity, because we're all pretty rude. Please use discretion if you're easily offended.

All materials published in "the footnote" are the property of their respective authors (unless otherwise noted) and are published with their consent.